My friend, i will copy once again your original post, so as all users to see it clearly that your original question what not only about the shape of the curve below 2500, (which nobody cares and i told you that the user of the dynamometer did not press the pedal to the metal) but you directly implied that car jackals, cheated with the dyno, because they could offer a discount of 10% on Dte product. And all that assumption was coming from someone who was whispering in your ears!
The person who owns the dyno, was choosen randomly, he is not a distributor of racechip or Dte. Car jackals, found a man who has a dynometer for many many years, and asked hin to make the comparison and comment on the shape of the curves, He mentioned both good and bad for DTE and Racechip too. Last but not least, we have measure 3 other cars in diferent dynos, with racechip, and the shape of the powerboand is the same. They produce from 206 to 209 horsepower as stock and the shape of the powerband does not change.
You entered forum 30 days ago, when the car jackals published their "research" on Youtube, and in your first post here, (this thread i will copy it in the end), you direclty imply that car jackals were payed from Dte to present their results, because ...they offer a discount on DTe products!! Here is your first post
"
Here is what is really strange.
The first chart is from the RaceChip's video and the lines look as you would expect them in terms of how they relate to the thin stock readings. But in the Car Jackals' video below the RaceChip's lines for both power and torque are exactly the same as the stock ones all the way up to 2700 rpm. What is happening?
A tin foil hat on my head reluctantly whispers in my ear that in the info for both DTE vs RaceChip videos on their channel you can find a code or something to get a small discount for the DTE products. Normally content creators get something if their code is used by clients."
So combining all the above, i strongly believe that its you who defend racechip. If you want to contribute to the forum, make your own "research" spend your own money, make the results repeatable with 2 or 3 independant cars, AND CONTRIBUTE TO OUR FORUM -N-cars.net" even if you offer a discount on behalf of powerchips.
My own contribution will be to measure using a tech edge wideband on the street, the real air fuel ration of the car for ECO, SPORT AND N MODE, both stock and tuned, so as users to see how their cars deal with air fuel ration in all of the above mods.
Cheers
The person who owns the dyno, was choosen randomly, he is not a distributor of racechip or Dte. Car jackals, found a man who has a dynometer for many many years, and asked hin to make the comparison and comment on the shape of the curves, He mentioned both good and bad for DTE and Racechip too. Last but not least, we have measure 3 other cars in diferent dynos, with racechip, and the shape of the powerboand is the same. They produce from 206 to 209 horsepower as stock and the shape of the powerband does not change.
You entered forum 30 days ago, when the car jackals published their "research" on Youtube, and in your first post here, (this thread i will copy it in the end), you direclty imply that car jackals were payed from Dte to present their results, because ...they offer a discount on DTe products!! Here is your first post
"
Here is what is really strange.
The first chart is from the RaceChip's video and the lines look as you would expect them in terms of how they relate to the thin stock readings. But in the Car Jackals' video below the RaceChip's lines for both power and torque are exactly the same as the stock ones all the way up to 2700 rpm. What is happening?
A tin foil hat on my head reluctantly whispers in my ear that in the info for both DTE vs RaceChip videos on their channel you can find a code or something to get a small discount for the DTE products. Normally content creators get something if their code is used by clients."
So combining all the above, i strongly believe that its you who defend racechip. If you want to contribute to the forum, make your own "research" spend your own money, make the results repeatable with 2 or 3 independant cars, AND CONTRIBUTE TO OUR FORUM -N-cars.net" even if you offer a discount on behalf of powerchips.
My own contribution will be to measure using a tech edge wideband on the street, the real air fuel ration of the car for ECO, SPORT AND N MODE, both stock and tuned, so as users to see how their cars deal with air fuel ration in all of the above mods.
Cheers
I guess you are paying more attention to my tin foil hat theory then I do apparently. This whole angle is not the focus of my attention. The identical lower rev curve that is not supposed to be like that is. I saw what you said about it and replied that I cannot make sense of what you are saying there. Language wise exclusively.
I am not really convinced that RaceChip needs me or anyone else to defend their product. I am merely replying to the random negativity that you keep bringing up even though it is not connected to the question I am asking. My curiosity was and is attracted by this one thing and you just stormed in yelling "RaceChip bad because one, two, three, four, five".
Claims from companies are often optimistic. Manufacturers, tuners, whatever. But it's funny that apparently a person looking for actual objectivity in data "doesn't like data coming from a neutral source", some charming logic. Please stop trying to win an argument that does not exist without you forcing it.
Last edited: