• Welcome to N-cars.net - the largest Hyundai N car forum. Check out the model specific sections below and scroll down for country specific forums. Scroll down for i30 N, Ioniq 5 N, i20 N, Veloster N and Kona N forums! Check out the i30 N Bible Here!

Acceleration times

If there is any math than please share your calculation. That would be interesting since I know that having only this numbers it would be 'not so easy' to calculate. For now I can see only what the car have shown and your assumptions without any calculations. I can agree only on arguments not on assumptions :D

After all the meter in the car could be only a non accurate gadget since I have witness on myself that the NM levels on the graph are not as they should comparing to the dyno.

But I can't wait to see a calculation that can actually prove it. Please provide one ;)
Wait no longer, here's your sign!! :D
This ^ will give you an idea, as you're obviously not familiar with such calculations and formulas. I can quote you numerous formulas; drag racers, engine builders; avionics engineers, motorcycle road racing, performance specialists, performance boat builders (inshore and offshore), WRC Teams, even F-1 Teams who utilize such formulas. They need to know if the engine and powertrain combinations are viable, before they begin to put them together. These calculation provide the teams with near specifications/restrictions, for the venues they compete in.
However, this ^ one will suffice for your purpose. :)

It's simple and will do the calculations for you. Which follows the old adage; KISS (Keep it simple, stupid). I realized right off, you weren't aware of what you were claiming. I've been at this a long time and know what whp and torque, it takes to produce such times. Most I can quote off the top of my head. :)

It is what it is. We haven't even taken account; transmission or gear ratios, octane fuel utilized, tyre grip, aerodynamics, etc. Frankly, if you're going to attempt to blow smoke up someone's butt; you need to know first, not everyone is misinformed or uninformed.:)

When you build a performance platform, you need to know what you can expect and the platforms expectations beforehand. If you don't, you're just spinning your wheels!! Nuff said.;)
 
Last edited:
Ladies and Gentlemen, I can't believe You're all getting so worked up over this! It didn't happen, the car can't do it, and the more You give it attention the more He gets His kicks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davo01
No need to get worked up. :) In fact , I believe it's kind of comical to be honest. All this is simple math and truth, which provides the reasonable, realistic , explanation. :)
 
No need to get worked up. :) In fact , I believe it's kind of comical to be honest. All this is simple math and truth, which provides the reasonable, realistic , explanation. :)
Of course it does Sir, it's the same nutter that was trolling the Forum a while ago I suspect, tomorrow He'll be telling us that the Television works because there are little Men and Women inside it! Stay safe and a great looking cooker by the way! :D
 
yep, this is a simplified calculation but it makes sense even taking not under account the details in the calculation You mention. So, in fact, You are right with it and the log on the car and me believing it for a moment are wrong 🙂😢

maybe after a cup of coffee, I take this calculation with N metrics since it takes torque under the account




Wait no longer, here's your sign!! :D
 
Last edited:
I’m not sure what the big deal is here? Point the car down slope, and off you go. ;)Particularly with some mods and a remap. On a level surface I agree with most - mid to low 5’s is achievable.

Now don’t scoff.....on a flat surface (abandoned airfield obviously) - I did 60mph to 125mph in 13.7s. That’s simply by using the lap timer on board and the speedometer. Car isn’t stock.

Would I try and submit that time official somewhere, of course not. It’s just some fun.
 
Of course it does Sir, it's the same nutter that was trolling the Forum a while ago I suspect, tomorrow He'll be telling us that the Television works because there are little Men and Women inside it! Stay safe and a great looking cooker by the way! :D


That's concerning. Should I be feeding them something? I couldn't have my Television stop during lockdown:p
 
  • Like
Reactions: R Veloster N
Pretty much sums up the Moderators ethos (well, mine anyway) on this site! 😆
And this coming from Mr. Cynical himself!!!😁😂😂 Never ceases to amaze! I think you're being affected by Wuhan symptoms!!😜
I’m not sure what the big deal is here? Point the car down slope, and off you go. 😉. Particularly with some mods and a remap. On a level surface I agree with most - mid to low 5’s is achievable.

Now don’t scoff.....on a flat surface (abandoned airfield obviously) - I did 60 mph to 125 mph in 13.7s. That’s simply by using the lap timer on board and the speedometer. Car isn’t stock.

Would I try and submit that time official somewhere, of course not. It’s just some fun.
😂 I do like the downslope perspective though, saves dramatically on the clutch 😂😜
 
Last edited:
mid 5's, possibly, low 4's, never, not with FWD. its a decently quick car, but not mega hatch fast. 0-60 has never bothered me, more interested in mid range. 4.40, it never happened.

Yep, it’s a Roll Racer, not a Drag Racer.

End. Of. Story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: R Veloster N
Car goes well for what it is, not the fastest, not the slowest, who cares as long as you're enjoying yourself.
There's a lot more to a car than going fast in a straight line it's the way it makes you feel when you look at it sit in it and the sheer pleasure of driving it with the windows open to hear the exhaust as you take a fast sweeping bend.
 
Wait no longer, here's your sign!! :D
This ^ will give you an idea, as you're obviously not familiar with such calculations and formulas. I can quote you numerous formulas; drag racers, engine builders; avionics engineers, motorcycle road racing, performance specialists, performance boat builders (inshore and offshore), WRC Teams, even F-1 Teams who utilize such formulas. They need to know if the engine and powertrain combinations are viable, before they begin to put them together. These calculation provide the teams with near specifications/restrictions, for the venues they compete in.
However, this ^ one will suffice for your purpose. :)

It's simple and will do the calculations for you. Which follows the old adage; KISS (Keep it simple, stupid). I realized right off, you weren't aware of what you were claiming. I've been at this a long time and know what whp and torque, it takes to produce such times. Most I can quote off the top of my head. :)

It is what it is. We haven't even taken account; transmission or gear ratios, octane fuel utilized, tyre grip, aerodynamics, etc. Frankly, if you're going to attempt to blow smoke up someone's butt; you need to know first, not everyone is misinformed or uninformed.:)

When you build a performance platform, you need to know what you can expect and the platforms expectations beforehand. If you don't, you're just spinning your wheels!! Nuff said.;)

Haha yeah that link is telling me my 330e will do 0-60mph in 6.6 seconds, actual time is 5.2 seconds :)

As for the bloke who's n is faster than a M140i (RWD, auto and 340bhp) and the Golf R (AWD, auto and 300bhp), I'd suggest looking at the Type R which has a similar amount of power, is manual and FWD and manages a mid 5 sec 0-62 mph time before trying it on...:rolleyes:
 
Hey team,

What 0-100's are you actually getting in your manual i30N's?

I know the website claims 5.9secs stock. Is this accurate? Are they slower, faster?

TIA,

Divv