As much as I like my Fastback I love the look of the Kona as more my cup of tea, Like the hatch on steds lol.I have I30N Hatch and my wife is driving Kona N, now comparing these two cars for a year I woudn't change I30N for Kona N but I would for I30N DCT
Hi Dacho, Would you explain your personal aspects please? Pros and Cons ?I have I30N Hatch and my wife is driving Kona N, now comparing these two cars for a year I woudn't change I30N for Kona N but I would for I30N DCT
I think you have to test the DCT first because that is a main difference and you got used to manual, there is no Kona with manual. Kona N is not as loud as i30N and you'll get less pops and bangs, less theatrics, your neighbours will like that. But it's still very fun to drive, they name it i30N for pensioners, much easier to get in with bad knees. Kona is a slightly more modern, you will have nice computer display, and you can have some better options if you want them (Head-Up display, Ventilated seats, Heated rear seats) you can't get with i30N. I think i30N looks better a sportier style, Kona looks like a lost baby hippo. So the i30N looks like a sporty car while Kona is just a family car with big tyres. It's a sleeper, it's faster than your old i30N (because of the new better turbo and the DCT).Looking at trading my 2019 i30N Fastback for the new Kona N, anyone else changed from a I30n be it a hatch or a fastback and was you happy with the change.
I got a Kona N and it's not a SUV feeling at all. It's a hot hatch too. You have a high seat position, that is the only similarityIt may sound too obvious or too simplistic, but the i30 is a hot hatchback and the Kona a hot SUV.
In general terms, I suppose this might explain the main differences. isn't it?
Yeah over 20cm shorter than my fastback, I'm no spring chicken and i do have a dodgy back/knees so the lack of bending to get in would be nice. Unfortunately I can't test drive one as only ones available near me are not regged yet.I got a Kona N and it's not a SUV feeling at all. It's a hot hatch too. You have a high seat position, that is the only similarity
to a SUV. It's the same stiff car as the i30N and you don't want to go offroad, it won't be a weekend car for fishing and hunting. And it's a little car, it's shorter than i30N even shorter than the hatcback!
Pretty much like my fastback then, always something that bugs ya but that's the compromise or I'd be spend 2 x the amount.The Kona N is much more uncomfortable to drive, it jumps a lot more on the road than the I30N, but that's why it's much faster, especially on the track, and that's only because of the DCT and the newer engine with a bigger turbo. Tomorrow I'm actually going to the track with the Kona N again with new tires because Pirelli are sh... but already on the first two track days the Kona N was faster (there is a big difference between manual transmission and DCT).
It is true that the Kona N is quieter than the first generation I30N, but the new generation I30N is actually all the same as the Kona N in terms of the mechanical part.
As a second or third car, it's great, but as the main and only one, we would never have it, little space, uncomfortable and some other little things that bother us
He is from UK, he can't get Elantra N. The Electric Ultimate is a totally different genre not a petrol N car. And in my experience there is no significant body roll, it's about the same stiff car as the i30N. It never wants to roll over it never feels unstable but the tyres would lose the grip sooner. I don't use it on track though, I don't try to race with it. I think it's better car then the pre-facelift i30N (and more expensive unfortunately). The question is the DCT transmission (how would ArcticFox like that after manual) and the other obvious option: the i30N DCT FL . I think he can't get the answer from here, he must test them, there is no other choice.Minimal storage room. Top heavy with to much body roll and rear end light, which contributes to oversteer when hard on the brakes. Needs to be lowered. The US version is disappointing, especially compared to both the Kona Ultimate and Elantra N.
I completely understand this., it’s rather obvious isn’t it?He is from UK, he can't get Elantra N. The Electric Ultimate is a totally different genre not a petrol N car. And in my experience there is no significant body roll, it's about the same stiff car as the i30N. It never wants to roll over it never feels unstable but the tyres would lose the grip sooner. I don't use it on track though, I don't try to race with it. I think it's better car then the pre-facelift i30N (and more expensive unfortunately). The question is the DCT transmission (how would ArcticFox like that after manual) and the other obvious option: the i30N DCT FL . I think he can't get the answer from here, he must test them, there is no other choice.
And yes the storage room is not great nor the leg-space in the rear seats, but at least the head-space a little bigger than the coupe-like Fastback. For little families I think with small children.
I completely understand this. The US Kona Ultimate is an ICE 1.6T Gamma II equipped SUV, not an EV. It utilizes the same chassis as the Kona N. The Kona Ultimate is trimmed out very well and includes options the Kona N ought to have, especially for the price.
On the track or pushing hard on the road Kona N, there’s ample body roll. Brake bias from front to rear is not correct and the rear end dances to much with hard brake application.
The lack of weigh in the rear and higher center of balance. Under heavy braking, this permits the Kona N to nose dive causing oversteer and loss of rear traction, especially when pushed hard in fast corners.
The Kona N reminded me much of the same as with the Kona Ultimate. It’s just the nature of the chassis in both.
DCT is in my opinion, dull and to seamless. There’s plenty of straight line umph, but this is not what Hyundai N-Performance was made for or touted in their advertising.
Let’s just say this; Hyundai N-Performance is more about their advertising, then performance aspect anymore. Long term, ICE N-Performamce autos are on the downside. No MY drivetrain upgrades. No plans to utilize the Smart Stream engine, except for replacing the 1.6T Gamma II in the I20N. A European replacement for the Veloster.
IMO, Hyundai is purposely turning a sport oriented car, into a family, daily use, dinosaur with 4-5 doors.
We've had a few Nthusiast members in Scotland change from an i30N to a KonaN and all have been very happy. It won't do a trip to IKEA for a wardrobe but, a weekly shop from Tesco isn't a problem. The 8 speed DCT is sweet; you can always go manual/paddles if you're wanting a bit more engagement. I've done some very spirited driving along some A and B roads in Scotland and in standard form the KonaN performed extremely well. I've recently had the Eibach Pro-Kit lowering springs fitted, which have dropped the front and rear by around 25mm and 35mm respectively. With cooler weather upon us, I've also changed the P-Zeros for some super premium Cross-Climate 2 All Season tyres. The new rubber and lowered suspension has resulted in much improved handling and it now sticks to the highland roads like Badger Sh*t on dog fur. Take one out for a long test drive. I'm sure you'll be as happy as our already converted Nthusiast brothers tooLooking at trading my 2019 i30N Fastback for the new Kona N, anyone else changed from a I30n be it a hatch or a fastback and was you happy with the change.