Thanks Al!
How often would one need to empty something like this roughly?
Is this actually a measured observation? Do you actually manage to balance fuel price difference with better fuel econmy in the end?I suspect so, in any event I always use the better petrol, V-Power, Tesco 99 or the Costco premium, although it is more expensive it certainly gives better performance AND You use less, so in real terms it doesn't cost more, We are what We eat! Cars are no different, be it fuel,oil or screenwash, buy the best!![]()
I haven't actually sat down with a calculator but I have a 56 mile daily commute and without doubt the good stuff lasts noticeably longerIs this actually a measured observation? Do you actually manage to balance fuel price difference with better fuel econmy in the end?
GDI valve build up (carbon) is a problem on most if not all direct injection engines especially turbo charged ones. This is not restricted to Hyundai engines. VW have a well known issue with this (...)
I had not heard of this with VW. It seems big enough a problem that manufacturers have to do something. I am glad they are starting to address it.Just FYI, VW has switched to a twin-injection lately
The new Volkswagen Polo GTI's special technical features include an electronic valve-lift system on the inlet side, a dual injection system with TSI and manifold injectors (combined direct and manifold injection), three-part oil scraper rings, an engine controller with four core processors and a Miller combustion cycle.
If your catch can is then plumbed back into the intake (i.e the catch can traps and contains oil vapour) then I don't see it being an issue. It's more or less just having a filter between the crank case and the intake.If you install a catch can, you lose your warranty. Arrrrr no.
Maybe... my MKv GTI (2006) was 98 in the manual and stated would run 95 albeit with reduced power output, that was from VW and explicitly stated in the manualThey are forced by law to write 95. No cars in EU can be sold without the ability to run 95, even if higher octane is preferable.


I can't wait to see the responses you get from this.My question is because the N is programmed to pop/backfire by retarding fuel ignition, do you think this would make the N even more susceptible to carbon build up ?
If fuel is being sent directly up the valves which is hardly even combusted would this add even further to the carbon build up ?
Or could you even argue that the unburnt fuel would cover the valves and actually prevent carbon build up ?
I can't wait to see the responses you get from this.
Correct - you are on right wayIsn't the carbon issue with the inlet valves? The unburnt fuel is exiting through the exhaust valves. The inlets still don't get washed by fuel.