Weather data during dyno session:
Here were the two best runs of nine (9). #1 was thrown out due to bad fuel ratio data (probe was in valved outlet; switched to non-valved outlet), while #5 was thrown out due to bad connection to an ignition wire. #4 had the highest horsepower and #8 had the highest torque. Note that this is using SAE correction factor.
Assuming the generally accepted value of 15% drivetrain loss, this works out to:
#4 - 270.8 BHP & 285.9 BTQ
#8 - 264.0 BHP & 290.6 BTQ
Now the same results with STD correction factor (what all tuners use in the VT community):
Again, assuming 15% drivetrain loss:
#4 - 277.6 BHP & 293.2 BTQ
#8 - 270.6 BHP & 297.9 BTQ
Now the raw results (i.e., no correction factor) for the same pulls:
Again, assuming 15% drivetrain loss:
#4 - 274.3 BHP & 289.7 BTQ
#8 - 266.6 BHP & 293.6 BTQ
Just for fun, here's how the DIN (German correction factor) results look:
With 15% drivetrain loss:
#4 - 278.8 & 294.4
#8 - 271.7 & 299.1
As you can see, correction factors muck with the numbers because of the environmental conditions they use. The real world numbers are raw/uncorrected but are only valid for the day and time under which they were run, while the correction factors are just to standardize against results in other locales with different environmental conditions.
Additionally, when I go back to do more dyno testing, the raw numbers won't be comparable since the environmental conditions will be slightly different, while the results using the correction factors will be comparable.
(To be continued further below)